This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

Dec. 10, 2024

Judge agrees with 'implicit bias' and 'microaggression' accusations by appeal justices

The concurrence said Superior Court Judge Randolph M. Hammock "committed a microaggression," that his "unwitting remarks ... indicate implicit bias" and that he had "mocked," "diminished" and patronized the plaintiff.

Superior Court Judge Randolph M. Hammock

A Los Angeles judge harbored no bias against a plaintiff and made no error in mostly, but not completely, ruling for her, a unanimous Court of Appeal panel found. Yet a concurrence by two of the justices said he had violated canons on three grounds by saying he was amused "to see this little Chinese woman stare at me because she didn't like my ruling."

The concurrence said Superior Court Judge Randolph M. Hammock "committed a microaggression," that his &quo...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails