This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

Jul. 18, 2025

Judges should judge

This Supreme Court term wasn't marked by one explosive ruling but by a deeper, unsettling theme: a conflicted and inconsistent retreat from judicial scrutiny, raising the fundamental question of whether courts should actively uphold constitutional rights or step aside in deference to government power.

Anastasia Boden

Staff Attorney
Pacific Legal Foundation

See more...

Judges should judge
Shutterstock

The Supreme Court term has officially ended. The justices are off gallivanting -- teaching in Europe, road-tripping in RVs and disappearing into the summer ether. Yet the decisions they issued continue to reverberate, even as the headlines have moved on.

This term won't be remembered for a single culture war bombshell. Instead, it should be defined by something deeper: a reckoning over what judges are even supposed to do.

...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up