For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email firstname.lastname@example.org for prices or call 949-702-5390.
To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email email@example.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright.
It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes
and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission.
Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial
marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
A pitched legal battle has begun over California's Clean Air Act emissions waiver, which allows the state to set its own more stringent vehicle pollution controls irrespective of federal standards. The EPA claims its power to grant that waiver entails an inherent power to revoke it, and moreover says a 1975 law - the Energy Policy and Conservation Act - preempts the Clean Air Act's provision that creates California's carve out.
Three guests join this week's podcast to discuss the issues involved in the matter, and the suit California and several other states now pursue against the Trump administration. Julia Stein (UCLA School of Law) discusses some background on the Clean Air Act section that heretofore has helped California battle its smog, and offers thoughts on the arguments likely to be advanced by the government in defense of its new rule. Greg Dotson (Univ. Oregon School of Law), who has written extensively on the preemption angle of the issue, joins the show discuss that, and Jay Himes (Labaton Sucharow) discusses the antitrust angle of the matter, as several automakers have agreed with California to maintain vehicle fleets that meet the state's standards.
Don't forget to claim CLE credit for listening to the show.