This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Firm Profile

Brothers in Law

Mendez & Sanchez

2026-01-14

MCLE

Department of Labor misinterprets VEVRAA, weakening veteran hiring requirements

Jan. 9, 2026

Federal contractors are supposed to give hiring preferenc...

By Eileen C. Moore

What California's plastic bag ban reveals about regulating waste by material type

Jan. 8, 2026

California's 2026 carryout bag law closes the thick plast...

By Roberto Escobar

Court of Appeal restores sanity to workers' comp treatment authorizations

Dec. 19, 2025

A new Second District Court of Appeal decision dismantles...

By Brent Daub, Glenn Olsen


Today's News

The hearing follows months of dispute over overburdened attorneys in the San Francisco Public Defender's Office and the declaration of "unavailable" days.


Judges and Judiciary


Federal prosecutors say Orange County Superior Court Judge Israel Claustro defrauded California's workers' compensation system by secretly operating a medica...


Litigation & Arbitration


In just 10 years, Larson LLP has grown from a Los Angeles boutique into a 60-lawyer "big-case platform" with offices on two continents. But the firm's leader...


Before his arraignment, Nick Reiner's private defense counsel withdrew, and he is now represented by a public defender in the double-murder case.


Judges and Judiciary


AB 1544 follows incidents in which journalists were barred from immigration court proceedings, raising questions about state authority over federal courts.


A federal judge ordered Los Angeles to pay $1.8 million in attorney fees, faulting the city for failing to provide accurate homelessness data and comply with...


Columns

Intellectual Property, Constitutional Law

Trademark not proven: Court sides with Villaraigosa in slogan spat

Jan. 14, 2026
By Jane Shay Wald, Erick Franklund

A California federal court's rejection of a trademark claim over "PROVEN PROBLEM SOLVER" highlights that the Lanham Act offers...


Military Law, Constitutional Law

From Nuremberg to My Lai, the "just following orders" defense has failed in U.S. and international law. So, when must servicem...


Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Administrative/Regulatory

SB 37 redefines "truthful and not misleading" for an era when AI, vendors and influencers often blur the line between real leg...



Verdicts & Settlements

Due Process Violation Estate of William Hayden Sc... $16,000,000
Wage and Hour The People of the State of ... $9,250,000
Negligent Care James Doherty Jr., et al. v... $7,637,000
Gender Discrimination Clare Weber, Anissa Rogers ... $6,000,000
Malpractice Doe Wife and Children v. Ro... $1,800,000
Wage and Hour Tina L. Hess, on behalf of ... $1,600,000
Police Misconduct Kyle Johnson v. City of San... $1,400,000
Auto v. Auto Francisco Reyes v. John Ho... $1,000,000
Truck v. Truck Bradford White v. YSV Truck... $873,548
Wage and Hour Rebecca Rivera, an individu... $850,000

On the Move

K&L Gates

Jan. 7, 2026


Zachary Timm was promoted to partner of K&L Gates in Los Angeles. The promotion is effective Jan. 1, 2026.

Timm focuses his practice on intellectual property litigation, labor and employment related litigation, business litigation, and class action defense. He has represented public and private companies in litigation involving claims for trade secrets misappropriation, tortious interference, employment discrimination, wrongful termination, wage and hour violations, breach of contract, false advertising, unfair competition, and fraud.


Neil A. Eddington was promoted to partner of K&L Gates in Los Angeles. The promotion is effective Jan. 1, 2026.

Eddington handles a wide range of employment-related cases; he is most often called upon to leverage his experience in litigating and advising on wage and hour issues. Eddington oversees single plaintiff and collective actions (class action and PAGA claims) alleging wage and hour violations, including regular rate of pay, overtime, and meal and rest break issues, among others.


Details

K&L Gates has 2000 attorneys in 45 offices including Los Angeles, Orange County, Palo Alto and San Francisco. Among the law firm’s key practice areas are Corporate/M&A, Energy & Infrastructure, Finance, Litigation & Dispute Resolution, and Intellectual Property. The firm’s website is klgates.com/

Featured Content


Community News

Los Angeles Superior Court launched Court Commons, a mobile exhibition offering legal education, resources for self-represente...



Podcasts

Davis Wright Tremaine's Vid Prabhakaran joins In the Counsel's Chair to break down three of the biggest challenges facing the ...


Daily Appellate Report

Criminal Law and Procedure

Modification: People v. Jimenez

Defendant was erroneously sentenced under the general vandalism statute, where a more specific, relevant statute concerning vandalism of jail property applied.


Consumer Law

Howard v. Republican National Committee

Telephone Consumer Protection Act did not prohibit the sending of text messages containing a video file that required the user to press play to view the file.


Criminal Law and Procedure

U.S. v. Gomez

Unpreserved claims on appeal are reviewed only for plain error and because district court's error classifying assault with a deadly weapon as a crime of violence was not plain, the senten...


Antitrust

Malheur Forest Fairness Coal v. Iron Triangle, LLC

Plaintiffs failed to plausibly plead that defendant timber company had a monopoly in harvest rights and other related markets for contracts with the U.S. Forest Service.


Attorneys

Chong v. Mardirossian Akaragian LLP

Law firm was entitled to its full contingency fee where client voluntarily ratified an allegedly unauthorized settlement by subsequently agreeing to and accepting its benefits.