An appeals court's downgrading of the federal standard of proof for sentencing enhancements has the potential to substantially affect sentencing proceedings in fraud and drug cases, some legal experts say. However, to others, the ruling represents business as usual as far as the distinction between "clear and convincing" and "preponderance of the evidence."
The recent opinion written by Chief 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Mary H. Murguia overruled...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In