Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A170255
|
Hastings College Conservation Committee et al. v. State of California et al.
Renaming Hastings College of the Law did not violate plaintiffs' rights or breach a purported contract between S.C. Hastings and the State of California. |
Contracts, Constitutional Law |
|
J. Goldman | Oct. 17, 2025 |
24-2339
|
Ani v. Bondi
Adverse credibility determination based on previous sham marriage was supported by substantial evidence, even though the falsehood was not central to the present claim for immigration relief. |
Immigration |
|
D. Bress | Oct. 17, 2025 |
B341295
|
In re R.L.
Trial court correctly found that Family Services failed to meet its burden of proving that child was at a current risk of harm based on isolated incident of neglect. |
Dependency |
|
V. Viramontes | Oct. 16, 2025 |
B333071
|
People v. Hernandez
Peremptory challenges to jurors based on youth alone do not violate prohibitions against discrimination in jury selection because youth is not a cognizable group for those purposes. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
H. Baltodano | Oct. 16, 2025 |
24-826
|
Humphreys v. Emmons
Order |
|
Oct. 16, 2025 | ||
24-1180
|
Thomas v. Humboldt Cty.
Order |
|
Oct. 16, 2025 | ||
25-89
|
Lee v. Poudre School Dist. R-1
Order |
|
Oct. 16, 2025 | ||
A168286A
|
People v. Dain
Remoteness in time, by itself, cannot serve as the basis for dismissing a criminal defendant's prior strike conviction under the Three Strikes law. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Miller | Oct. 16, 2025 |
24-2745
|
Warfield v. Nance
Claim preclusion did not apply to debtor's amended exemptions because his claim of federal bankruptcy exemptions could not have been tried with his claim of state and federal nonbankruptcy exemptions. |
Bankruptcy |
|
J. Lefkow | Oct. 15, 2025 |
21-55365
|
Munoz v. U.S. Dept. of State
Order |
|
Oct. 15, 2025 | ||
A170821
|
California Dental Assn. v. Delta Dental of California
Delta Dental did not breach the covenant of good faith and fair dealing by making fee changes that its contracts with dentists expressly permitted. |
Contracts |
|
K. Banke | Oct. 14, 2025 |
A168669
|
Doe v. Kachru
Plaintiff's Civil Code section 52.4 claim failed because statute requires discriminatory gender-based intent, and medical battery during childbirth alone does not constitute gender-motivated violence. |
Torts, Health Care |
|
K. Banke | Oct. 14, 2025 |
25-6268
|
State of Oregon v. Trump
Order |
|
Oct. 10, 2025 | ||
D084269
|
De Meo v. Cooley LLP
Law firm had no attorney-client relationship with tech company's co-founder when its conduct evidenced that its relationship was solely with the company, not its co-founder. |
Attorneys |
|
J. Irion | Oct. 10, 2025 |
24-2626
|
Gopher Media LLC v. Melone
Orders denying motions to strike under California's anti-SLAPP statute are not immediately appealable and do not satisfy the requirements for an interlocutory appeal under the collateral order doctrine. |
Anti-SLAPP |
|
M. Murguia | Oct. 10, 2025 |
S283305
|
People v. Guevara
Considering the constitutional avoidance doctrine, Penal Code section 1172.75's resentencing directive was ambiguous enough to incorporate section 1170.126's public safety inquiry, maintaining courts' resentencing discretion and the statute's constitutionality. |
Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law |
|
K. Evans | Oct. 10, 2025 |
A168537
|
People v. Hill
Sixth Amendment's unanimity requirement was not violated where statute allowed jury to convict for continuous sexual abuse of a child without agreeing on the individual underlying acts supporting guilt. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
I. Petrou | Oct. 13, 2025 |
E083029
|
People v. McKean
Penal Code section 1172.75 does not permit resentencing for defendants serving time on convictions for in-prison offenses because those subsequent sentences do not merge or aggregate with the original term. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Miller | Oct. 13, 2025 |
B344660
|
In re Claudia R.
Child welfare agency's noncompliance with Indian Child Welfare Act inquiry obligation resulted in parental termination orders being conditionally reversed for conformance with statutory requirements. |
Dependency |
|
G. Feuer | Oct. 13, 2025 |
A165535
|
People v. Garcia
Trial court correctly overruled objection to peremptory challenge of Black prospective juror where, considering totality of circumstances, an objectively reasonable person would not view cognizable group membership as a factor. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Clay | Oct. 13, 2025 |
24-3634
|
U.S. v. Tainewasher
District court did not plainly err by failing to instruct jury that, to convict defendant of facilitating a drug felony, it must also find that the drug felony was actually committed. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
P. Curiam (9th Cir.) | Oct. 13, 2025 |
25-2808
|
Community Legal Services v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services
Order |
|
Oct. 13, 2025 | ||
B336042
|
New Commune DTLA LLC v. City Redondo Beach
City's residential overlay zone, which kept underlying commercial zoning, failed to meet strict Housing Element Law requirements to address low-income housing. |
Municipal Law, Real Property |
|
K. Klatchko | Oct. 13, 2025 |
A171937
|
Move Eden Housing v. City of Livermore
Because the City of Livermore's 2024 resolution did not reenact the essential features of its 2022 resolution, the 2024 resolution constituted a valid and complete repeal. |
Municipal Law, Real Property |
|
M. Simons | Oct. 9, 2025 |
B337826
|
People v. Gomez
Defendant who was a juvenile at the time of his offense was eligible for resentencing even though his adult codefendant had not been convicted of the same offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Collins | Oct. 9, 2025 |
D083765
|
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Diblin
Jury's negligence determination did not render defendant's intentional attack on his housemate an "accident" that was covered under insurance policy. |
Insurance |
|
J. McConnell | Oct. 9, 2025 |
G064622
|
Atlanta Falcons v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd.
Atlanta Falcons NFL team was exempted from former football player's workers' compensation claim under Labor Code sections 3600.5(c) and (d). |
Workers' Compensation |
|
M. Gooding | Oct. 9, 2025 |
H050387
|
People v. Melgoza
Modified jury instruction defining "force" for forcible rape and forcible oral copulation as including movement or positioning of the victim's body misstated the law and constituted prejudicial error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Grover | Oct. 9, 2025 |
H052179
|
People v. Cortez
"Removals," violent intra-gang punishments of members accused of robbing or stealing from associates, provided non-reputational benefits required by amendments to gang special circumstances under Penal Code section 186.22. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Grover | Oct. 9, 2025 |
25A326
|
Noem v. National TPS Alliance
Order |
|
Oct. 9, 2025 |