| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
B338002
|
In re E.G.
Juvenile court's jurisdictional finding that substantial evidence supported sexual abuse allegations was affirmed despite child's retraction of sexual abuse allegations. |
Dependency |
|
M. Stratton | Jul. 7, 2025 |
|
A171007
|
Oakland Unified School Dist. v. Public Employment Relations Bd.
The Educational Employment Relations Act (EERA) does not prohibit public school employees from engaging in unfair labor practice strikes. |
Labor Law, Education |
|
D. Chou | Jul. 7, 2025 |
|
B333718
|
Taylor v. Los Angeles Unified School District
Education code shielded school district from liability for negligent hiring of employee who caused student's death during non-school-related, off-campus interaction with the employee. |
Immunity, Torts |
|
R. Adams | Jul. 7, 2025 |
|
S279969
|
Ford Motor Warranty Cases
Ford Motor Company was not entitled to compel auto-buyers' claims to arbitration by relying on arbitration clauses in the sales contracts between the buyers and seller dealerships. |
Arbitration, Consumer Law |
|
C. Corrigan | Jul. 7, 2025 |
|
S282314
|
In re Bradshaw
Defrauding trust by repeatedly hiring contractor trustee controlled without disclosing his role and attempting to conceal this role from the court warranted disbarment. |
Attorneys |
|
G. Liu | Jul. 7, 2025 |
|
25-1020
|
In re: Pamela Lacher
Bankruptcy discharge injunction did not operate to stay State Bar disciplinary proceedings that arose due to attorney's conduct as to one of her debts. |
Bankruptcy, Attorneys |
|
R. Faris | Jul. 2, 2025 |
|
A169022
|
Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. v. Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff who agreed to arbitration as an individual did not bind the state, so he could maintain qui tam action on behalf of the real party in interest, the state. |
Arbitration, Consumer Law |
|
J. Humes | Jul. 2, 2025 |
|
G063580
|
Rogers v. City of Redlands
City's imposition of a surcharge to its waste refuse customers to help alleviate street repair costs incurred from the impact of refuse vehicles violated Vehicle Code section 9400.8. |
Municipal Law, Utilities |
|
J. Motoike | Jul. 2, 2025 |
|
E084508
|
RND Contractors, Inc. v. Superior Court (Wiseman + Rohy Structural Engineers)
In case of first impression, any adverse party may oppose a motion for summary judgment even if plaintiff did not oppose the motion and there was no cross-claim. |
Civil Procedure |
|
C. Codrington | Jul. 2, 2025 |
|
23-15650
|
Harrington v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
District courts must assess each opt-in plaintiff's claim in collective action under Fair Labor Standards Act for sufficient connections to the defendant's activities in the forum state to support specific personal jurisdiction. |
Employment Law, Civil Procedure |
|
M. Hawkins | Jul. 2, 2025 |
|
22-55360
|
Obrien v. Bisignano
Substantial evidence did not support administrative law judge's determination that disability insurance applicant's past telemarketing jobs constituted "past relevant work." |
Administrative Agencies |
|
D. Collins | Jul. 2, 2025 |
|
A171451
|
City of Vallejo v. Superior Court (ACLU of Northern California)
Records relating to an investigation of officers' shootings were disclosable to a Public Records Act request and not exempt under the *Pitchess* statutes. |
Public Records Act |
|
K. Banke | Jul. 1, 2025 |
|
24-6586
|
Black v. Tennessee
Order |
|
Jul. 1, 2025 | ||
|
24-6410
|
Wiggins v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jul. 1, 2025 | ||
|
24-435
|
GHP Management Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
Order |
|
Jul. 1, 2025 | ||
|
24-355
|
MacRae v. Mattos
Order |
|
Jul. 1, 2025 | ||
|
24-809
|
Goldey v. Fields
*Bivens* does not extend to Eighth Amendment excessive force claims. |
Prisoners' Rights |
|
P. Curiam (USSC) | Jul. 1, 2025 |
|
24-1468
|
Husayn v. Mitchell
Under the Military Commissions Act, district court lacked jurisdiction over alleged enemy combatant's cause of action regarding use of "enhanced interrogation techniques" against him at CIA secret prison. |
Government |
|
A. Johnstone | Jul. 1, 2025 |
|
D082890
|
People v. Barnum
Because evidence sufficiently supported direct aiding and abetting, defendant's first degree murder conviction did not warrant reversal when jury did not specify which theory it relied on to find guilt. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Rubin | Jul. 1, 2025 |
|
A169968
|
Wang v. Peletta
Trial court did not err in determining that because plaintiffs' unpermitted retaining wall constituted a public nuisance, they could not obtain a prescriptive easement. |
Real Property |
|
A. Tucher | Jul. 1, 2025 |
|
H051237
|
People v. Bray
Probation restriction that defendant refrain from dating, socializing, or forming a romantic relationship with" any person with physical custody of a minor unless approved was unconstitutionally overbroad. |
Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law |
|
L. Rodriguez | Jul. 1, 2025 |
|
A170047
|
People v. Miller
Defendant charged with felony-murder following the passage of Senate Bill 1437 was not eligible for relief under Penal Code section 1172.6. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Chou | Jul. 1, 2025 |
|
A169585
|
Oakland Bulk and Oversized Terminal v. City of Oakland
Oakland improperly terminated lease for failure to complete milestones, where Oakland's refusal to cooperate fell within the contract's force majeure clause. |
Contracts |
|
J. Richman | Jul. 1, 2025 |
|
C100034
|
Ortiz v. Daimler Truck North America LLC
Determining whether not including safety feature absent on truck involved in fatal accident was a proximate cause of accident, and therefore defective design, was a question of fact for the jury. |
Torts |
|
S. Boulware Eurie | Jul. 1, 2025 |
|
A170714
|
International Currency Technologies v. ICT, Inc.
Trial court properly granted prejudgment interest and denied motion for new trial on conversion claim, where substantial evidence supported jury's $550,000 damages verdict. |
Remedies |
|
M. Miller | Jul. 1, 2025 |
|
G064139
|
Prato v. Gioia
Failure to give notice of opposing counsel's pending disciplinary action that rendered him ineligible to practice law to opposing party, once discovered, was prejudicial. |
Attorneys, Civil Procedure |
|
E. Moore | Jul. 1, 2025 |
|
A162646
|
Ceron v. Liu
Defendant in malicious prosecution was entitled to judgment in her favor where she established a valid advice-of-counsel defense. |
Real Property, Civil Procedure |
|
I. Petrou | Jun. 30, 2025 |
|
B330610
|
Center for Biological Diversity v. County of Los Angeles
Environmental impact report for new development project was misleading regarding greenhouse gas emissions because it proposed offsetting emissions through state's cap-and-trade program for which the project was ineligible. |
Environmental Law |
|
G. Martinez | Jun. 30, 2025 |
|
A170085
|
Applegate v. Carrington Foreclosure Services, LLC
Prospective owner-occupant of foreclosed property failed to state a claim under Civil Code section 2924m. |
Real Property |
|
M. Miller | Jun. 30, 2025 |
|
B341644
|
Teran v. Superior Court (People)
Despite obtaining the information from Los Angeles Sheriff's Department database, former employee did not violate Penal Code section 502(c)(2) because the information was publicly available on the Los Angeles Superior Court website. |
Criminal Law and Procedure, Government |
|
C. Moor | Jun. 30, 2025 |
For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424. To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com