Personal Injury & Torts
Aug. 25, 2001
Arbitration Provision Makes Med-Mal Litigation Worse
Medical-malpractice litigation is complex, time-consuming and expensive. When two or more defendants are potentially responsible for a client's injuries and only one defendant has an arbitration agreement, the potential for being forced to split the case into two forums with twice the expense and time, as well as the potential for inconsistent decisions, is very real.
By Steven D. Fondiler
Medical-malpractice litigation is complex, time-consuming and expensive. When two or more defendants are potentially responsible for a client's injuries and only one defendant has an arbitration agreement, the potential for being forced to split the case into two forums with twice the expense and time, as well as the potential for i...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In