This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
2026-11-10

MCLE

Immigration restrictions, war and the changing landscape of family law

Nov. 3, 2026

Immigration restrictions, currency fluctuations and poten...

By Abbas Hadjian

Algorithms, 'addictive' features and age limits: The First Amendment's social media patchwork

Oct. 28, 2026

Federal courts are drawing different First Amendment line...

By Krista L. Baughman

Supremely short sighted

Oct. 28, 2026

The Supreme Court missed two opportunities to remedy the ...

By Michael M. Berger


Special Coverage

Casey R. Johnson plans to build on the plaintiffs' bar's campaign against improper client solicitation, outside financial infl...



Today's News

A federal magistrate judge questioned the government's plan to process just 200 pages a month in a lawsuit seeking records about alleged pressure on immigrat...


9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals


A divided appellate panel allowed California to require large companies to report direct greenhouse gas emissions and emissions from purchased energy but blo...


A judge ruled that San Francisco's Access Line Tax applies to lines without emergency or outbound calling capabilities but sided with Bandwidth on the ordina...


Intellectual Property


Separate federal lawsuits accuse the AI music platform of using copyrighted recordings and lyrics without permission, while Elvis Presley's rights holders al...


Government


The combination with Los Angeles-based Carpenter, Rothans & Dumont, effective Jan. 1, will expand Jones Mayer's litigation defense capabilities and give ...


Litigation & Arbitration


A Los Angeles judge ruled that an arbitrator, not the court, must decide whether agreements consumers accepted as Uber passengers cover claims involving frau...


Columns

Litigation & Arbitration

Four years of hard-fought litigation, then four settlements in three months. What the Los Angeles social media bellwether teac...


Environmental & Energy

California's water conflicts are not new, nor are they simply a matter of "fish v. farms." The real issue is whether all branc...


Ethics/Professional Responsibility

California's new litigation funding rules will test how funders structure returns, finance portfolios and monitor investments ...



Verdicts & Settlements

Wage and Hour Uber Technologies Wage and ... $272,500,000
Auto v. Pedestrian Carol Dietz, individually a... $41,060,756
Auto v. Auto Alejandra Gutierrez, et al.... $25,000,000
Negligent Supervision Doe 2 - Doe 8 v. Sonora Com... $18,500,000
Unfair Business Practices The People of the State of ... $6,860,000
Wage and Hour Joyce Dempsey and Sylvia Re... $5,700,000
Wage and Hour Dennis Bullard, individuall... $3,750,000
Retaliation Shirin Buckman v. City of L... $1,919,862
Wage and Hour Zachary Del Rio, an individ... $1,900,000
Wage and Hour Christopher Johnson, indivi... $1,750,000

On the Move

Ogletree Deakins

Nov. 6, 2026


Timothy Pico joined Ogletree Deakins as a shareholder in Los Angeles. The move was Nov. 2, 2026.

Pico is an employment litigator with nearly 30 years of legal experience. His practice focuses on representing employers in matters involving wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage-and-hour disputes, and actions brought under California's Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). He also provides preventive advice and counsel on workplace issues.


Brett Markson joined Ogletree Deakins as a shareholder in Los Angeles. The move was Feb. 11, 2026.

Markson is an employment litigator with more than 30 years of legal experience, and his practice also focuses on matters involving wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage-and-hour disputes, and actions brought under California's Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). In addition, Markson handles single-plaintiff, class, and collective actions and represents employers in leave and accommodation, whistleblower, privacy, and trade secret matters.


Details

Ogletree Deakins has 1200 attorneys in 62 offices including Los Angeles, Orange County, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, Torrance, Fresno. Among the law firm’s key practice areas are traditional labor and employment, workplace safety, employee benefits, and business immigration. The firm’s website is ogletree.com

Address

400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200 , Los Angeles California 90071 United States
T: (404) 260-1493

Featured Content


Community News

Slideshow, Community News


Former California Supreme Court Justice Martin J. Jenkins and retired appellate Justice Arthur Gilbert discussed judicial inde...



Daily Appellate Report

Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Fuller

Prosecutors must prove a defendant was on parole when a violation occurred, even if the defendant never challenged his parole status.


Constitutional Law

USA Chamber of Commerce v. Sanchez

Data regarding emissions of third-parties in a company's value chain was insufficiently tethered to companies' own operations to be commercial speech, so portion of law requiring its disc...


Torts, Education

Social Media Cases

Meta, TikTok, Snap and YouTube are not liable for school districts' costs of responding to students' alleged social-media addiction.


Criminal Law and Procedure

U.S. v. Abdul Kareem

Conspiracy to act as independent advocates of ISIS by carrying out attack free from the organization's direction was insufficient to support conviction for providing material support to t...


Immigration

Amended Opinion: Navarrete v. Blanche

Ninth Circuit lacked jurisdiction to review standalone claim regarding denial of Convention Against Torture protection because it was not, nor did it merge with, a final order of removal.