Zoning, Planning and Use
Aug. 18, 2001
Land O'Lakes
Where an agency's denial makes clear the extent of development permitted, ripeness rules do not require the submission of further applications.
A recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court laid down clarifying rules as to the ripeness doctrine in takings cases. Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, 121 S.Ct. 2448 (2001). Even though it expanded on the ripeness doctrine, the decision did not find a per se taking because the owner was sti...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In