This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Health Care & Hospital Law

Feb. 2, 2012

9th Circuit says yes to bone marrow compensation

Now that the science behind bone marrow transplants has improved, there is no rational basis to ban compensation for donors. By Matt Brinton of Southwestern Law School


By Matt Brinton


Until roughly a month ago, U.S. law absolutely banned compensation for donors of bone marrow. (42 U.S.C Section 274(e)) A recent decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, however, suggests that due to scientific advances, the law's wide-ranging language is unconstitutional - and that blood marrow donors should be compensated for their life-giving gifts. In Flynn v. Holder, 2011 DJDAR 17254 (Dec. 1, 2011), the 9th Circuit ruled...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up