This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Feb. 1, 2012

Generic drug suits gets legs

The U.S. Supreme Court swept the legs out from under patients with product liability lawsuits against generic drug manufacturers last year, but those plaintiffs are getting back on their feet.


By Mandy Jackson


Daily Journal Staff Writer


The U.S. Supreme Court swept the legs out from under patients with product liability lawsuits against generic drug manufacturers last year, but those plaintiffs are getting back on their feet.


The high court said in Pliva v. Mensing that plaintiffs could not sue generic drugmakers under state failure-to-warn laws because federal regulations regarding medicine labels preempted those claims. ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up