Intellectual Property
Jan. 31, 2012
Judge denies summary judgment in Bratz insurers case
A federal court judge denied a summary judgment motion by a group of insurance companies that contended they shouldn't have to cover Bratz manufacturer MGA Entertainment Inc.'s legal costs involving the company’s spat with Mattel Inc. over the dolls.
By Jason W. Armstrong
Daily Journal Staff Writer
A federal court judge denied a summary judgment motion by a group of insurance companies that contended they shouldn't have to cover Bratz manufacturer MGA Entertainment Inc.'s legal costs involving the company's spat with Mattel Inc. over the dolls. In a ruling late Friday, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter disagreed with arguments by Evanston Insurance Company and other insurers that they shouldn't have to cover MGA bec...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In