This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Banking

Jan. 31, 2012

The limitations of the sham guaranty defense

Although this defense is used more now because of the economic downturn, it is rarely truly applicable. By Benjamin Taylor of Miller Barondess LLP


By Benjamin Taylor


Many commercial loan transactions involve a personal guaranty of repayment, given by either a principal of the borrower or a related entity. Lenders will often require a personal guaranty, sometimes from multiple guarantors, even when the underlying loan is secured by real estate or personal property. In the context of a collections action to enforce the guaranty, a popular but often improperly claimed defense is that of the "sham guaranty...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up