This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jan. 26, 2012

Child custody: Should the pendulum swing back to a primary caregiver?

Recent findings in neuroscience suggest that joint physical custody may not be in the child's best interest. By Renee Leff


By Renee Leff


Prior to 1982, under The Tender Years Doctrine, children were thought better off in the care of their mother in the event of divorce or death of the father. After 1982, the social thinking changed, with the belief that the best interests of the children were served with frequent and continuing access to both parents. Courts began declaring joint physical custody, and thus began the shuffling of children from parent to parent, house to house. Recent ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up