This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Jan. 20, 2012

Jurists grapple with appellate guidelines

Oracle Corp.'s difficulty in putting together a damages expert's report that would satisfy a San Francisco federal judge illustrates the larger dilemma facing jurists who must follow new appellate guidelines without much of a map.


By Craig Anderson


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Oracle Corp.'s difficulty in putting together a patent damages report that will satisfy a San Francisco federal judge illustrates the larger dilemma facing jurists who must follow new appellate guidelines without much of a map.


After U.S. District Judge William Alsup rejected portions of an Oracle expert's report on damages allegedly caused by Google's infringement of the Java programmin...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up