By Jules Zeman and William Martin
In the widely anticipated decision in McCann v. Foster Wheeler LLC, the California Supreme Court unanimously held that California's interest in affording a remedy to a California resident who was exposed to asbestos in another state was outweighed by the Oklahoma's interests in providing fair treatment to, and an appropriate incentive for, business enterprises. The decision immediately raises interesting questions of the e...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In