This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Jul. 22, 2008

9th Circuit Should Acknowledge New Police Search Precedent

In the coverage of this year's Supreme Court term, commentators have not recognized that the court unanimously overruled a 15-year-old line of 9th Circuit precedent that prohibited certain searches under the Fourth Amendment, writes Michael J. Raphael. - Forum Column

FORUM COLUMN

By Michael J. Raphael
This article appears on Page 6

      In the coverage of this year's Supreme Court term, commentators have not recognized that the court unanimously overruled a 15-year-old line of 9th Circuit precedent that prohibited certain searches under the Fourth Amendment. The omission is understandable, because the case that the court decided did not come from the 9th Circuit, and the court di...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up