Zoning, Planning and Use
Sep. 21, 2002
Case Highlights Importance of Meeting Statutes of Limitations
Focus Column - By Daniel J. Curtin - In Travis v. Santa Cruz County, 100 Cal.App.4th 609 (2002), decided on July 25, the court held that a 90-day statute of limitations barred a challenge to a land use ordinance. This decision, like the California Supreme Court decision in Utility Cost Management v. Indian Wells Valley Water District, 26 Cal.4th 1185 (2001), upholding a 120-day statute of limitations to challenge a water fee, highlights the need to challenge land use regulations and decisions within a very short time frame.
By Daniel J. Curtin
In Travis v. Santa Cruz County, 100 Cal.App.4th 609 (2002), decided on July 25, the court held that a 90-day statute of limitations barred a challenge to a land...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In