This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Front Page

Sep. 17, 2002

Inventorship Decision Requires Claim Construction

Focus Column - By Elizabeth E. Launer - The concept of joint inventorship, where two or more people make a single patentable invention, has been called "one of the muddiest concepts in the muddy metaphysics of the patent law." Mueller Brass Co. v. Reading Indus. , 352 F. Supp. 1357 (E.D. Pa. 1972), aff'd , 487 F.2d 1395 (3d Cir. 1973). Lacking a bright-line test, litigators, patent attorneys and the federal courts all have struggled to identify the correct joint inventors.

        Focus Column
        
        By Elizabeth E. Launer
        
        The concept of joint inventorship, where two or more people make a single patentable invention, has been called "one of the muddiest concepts in the muddy met...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails