This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Aug. 30, 2002

Businesses Shouldn't Rely on Nonacceptance Provisions

Focus Column - By Michael J. Kump - In a recent thought-provoking article concerning the limits of Business and Professions Code Section 16600, Allen B. Grodsky argued that "there are several critical situations in which nonacceptance provisions, when carefully phrased, can be enforced." "Some Nonacceptance Provisions Can Be Enforceable," Focus, July 11.

        Focus Column
        
        By Michael J. Kump
        
        In a recent thought-provoking article concerning the limits of Business and Professions Code Section 16600, Allen B. Grodsky argued that "there are several critical ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails