This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Oct. 2, 2014

Similar. Substantially similar?

A lawsuit over infringement of the James Bond character has spotlighted an issue in copyright law that plagues screenwriters: What are the boundaries of substantial similarity between works? By Jordanna Thigpen


By Jordanna Thigpen


Last week, U.S. District Judge James Otero refused to dismiss a lawsuit by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. against NBCUniversal for infringing upon the James Bond character. See Danjaq LLC et al. v. Universal City Studios LLC et al., 14-02527 (C.D. Cal., filed April 3, 2014). The lawsuit has spotlighted an issue in copyright law that plagues screenwriters: What are the boundaries of substantial similarity between works?


The lawsuit ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up