This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Oct. 1, 2014

For plaintiffs, foreign corporations increasingly elusive

The Supreme Court has significantly diminished the ability of plaintiffs to obtain a forum in the United States for adjudication of their claims against foreign corporations By Clyde Spillenger


By Clyde Spillenger


In Mendoza Martinez v. Aero Caribbean, 2014 DJDAR 11448 (Aug. 21, 2014), the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that in-state service on an officer of a corporate defendant does not, by itself, establish constitutionally adequate personal jurisdiction over such a defendant, as it would for an individual defendant under the plurality opinion in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Burnham v. Superior Court (1990). Since the holding ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up