In Mendoza Martinez v. Aero Caribbean, 2014 DJDAR 11448 (Aug. 21, 2014), the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that in-state service on an officer of a corporate defendant does not, by itself, establish constitutionally adequate personal jurisdiction over such a defendant, as it would for an individual defendant under the plurality opinion in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Burnham v. Superior Court (1990). Since the holding ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In