This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Technology & Science

Sep. 26, 2014

New cell towers are no game of poker

The 9th Circuit's most recent decision gives good guidance to cellphone carriers seeking to fill gaps in their coverage, and to cities that process those requests from the carriers. By Javan N. Rad


By Javan Rad


Cellphone companies make much ado about cities' treatment of their efforts to install new towers and antennas. However, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in particular, has issued several decisions to guide how courts should evaluate carriers' claims that cities have "prohibited" cellular service under the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. The court's most recent decision in American Tower Corp. v. City of San Dieg...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up