It has long been a practice among commercial litigators and their clients to agree to a settlement with a defendant/borrower which allows a discount if settlement payments are timely made. Unfortunately, this practice potentially has been invalidated by Greentree Financial Group Inc. v. Execute Sports Inc., 163 Cal. App. 4th 495 (2008), and Purcell v. Schweitzer, 224 Cal. App. 4th 969 (2014).
Enter...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




