It has long been a practice among commercial litigators and their clients to agree to a settlement with a defendant/borrower which allows a discount if settlement payments are timely made. Unfortunately, this practice potentially has been invalidated by Greentree Financial Group Inc. v. Execute Sports Inc., 163 Cal. App. 4th 495 (2008), and Purcell v. Schweitzer, 224 Cal. App. 4th 969 (2014).
Enter...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In