This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government

Sep. 13, 2014

Doctor testing provision costing MICRA initiative traditional labor allies

Plaintiff's attorneys want California voters to approve a ballot measure raising the state's cap on medical malpractice payouts. But their decision to add a provision to require drug testing of doctors may now be costing them key allies.


By Paul Jones


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Plaintiff's attorneys want California voters to approve a ballot measure raising the state's cap on medical malpractice payouts. But their decision to also add a provision to require drug testing of doctors - which has polled well with voters - may now be costing attorneys the support of traditional allies.


"No on 46," a doctor and malpractice insurer-led campaign against attorneys'...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up