This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Letters,
Judges and Judiciary,
Alternative Dispute Resolution

Jun. 16, 2012

'You can lead a horse to water...': the pros and cons of mandatory mediation

"Court-ordered mediation often fails to deliver" (June 8) generalizes and oversimplifies the issue.

Scott Slater Markus

"Court-ordered mediation often fails to deliver" (June 8) generalizes and oversimplifies the issue. Ordering parties to participate in mediation may be appropriate in some cases, but certainly not all cases.

Unfortunately, court-ordered mediation is more likely to be ineffective when the parties fail to have decision-makers present and invested in the process. Instead, recalcitrant parties and their counsel go through the motions and the mediation really is a waste of time and mone...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails