Law Practice
Jun. 7, 2012
Objecting to objections: an objectionable new summary judgment requirement
The 2nd District's conclusion in Tartle will unfairly burden parties opposing objections. By Barry M. Wolf
The 2nd District Court of Appeal has recently concluded that parties must oppose evidentiary objections made in connection with summary judgment or forfeit any appellate challenge to rulings on these objections. Tarle v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. 2012 DJDAR 6690 (Cal. App. 2nd Dist. May 22, 2012). Unless this decision is overturned or corrective action is taken, trial courts and parties opposing objections will be unfairly burden...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In