This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Jun. 1, 2012

An object lesson in thinking twice before suing for malicious prosecution

Anti-SLAPP is a powerful tool and can bite back if you're not careful pursuing malicious prosecution claims. By Stephen Kaus of Cooper, White & Cooper LLP

Steve Kaus

Partner, Cooper, White & Cooper

No one likes to be sued. Defendants who win their cases often want to pursue a malicious prosecution suit in retribution for being sued in the first place. The desire to get even is understandable, powerful and generally wrongheaded.

There are several reasons not to sue an unsuccessful plaintiff for malicious prosecution, including the need to litigate the initial suit to a favorable termination on the merits, the difficulty of establishing that the plaintiff had no probable cau...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails