Winners in civil lawsuits can't recover fees for translating documents as part of awards for court costs under the Court Interpreters Act, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday.
The court premised the ruling, which overturns a decision by the 9th Circuit, on the ordinary definition of "interpreter" meaning somebody who translates orally from one language to another. Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



