This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Insurance

Jun. 18, 2004

Possibility of Coverage Triggers Duty to Defend

Focus Column - Insurance Law - By Kirk Pasich - It has long been said that an insurer's duty to defend is broader than its duty to indemnify, and that all that is required to trigger the duty to defend is a "potential" for coverage. However, what do these phrases really mean? And how does one determine exactly how broad the duty to defend is and when there is a potential for coverage?

        
        
        Focus Column
        
        Insurance Law
<...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up