This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Jun. 11, 2008

Stocks and (Marriage) Bonds

While state property and family laws may treat married same-sex couples the same as married heterosexual couples, the federal tax laws do not, and instead treat the couples as unrelated, with potentially devastating tax consequences, writes Shari A. Levitan and Tamara E. Kolz. - Focus Column

FOCUS COLUMN

By Shari A. Levitan and Tamara E. Kolz
This article appears on Page 7

      Following the California Supreme Court's decision in In re Marriage Cases, attention has shifted from whether same-sex couples in California would be able to marry, to the practical economic aspects of their marital partnership. Specifically, such couples will now need to concern themselves with the challenges of joint asset owne...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up