Focus (Forum & Focus)
Jun. 4, 2008
Illusory Protections
Proposition 99's transparent purpose is to confuse the voters and divert their attention from the competing Proposition 98, writes Gideon Kanner. - Forum Column
By Gideon Kanner
This article appears on Page 6
Two competing propositions are on the ballot in today's election - Propositions 98 and 99, both purporting to amend the state Constitution to restrict the use of eminent domain. The problem is that only one - Proposition 98 - does that. The other one - Proposition 99 - is a red herring, designed to confuse the voters and to keep them from voting yes on...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In