This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

May 24, 2008

In Depositions, Objections Follow Different Rules

Many counsel seem unaware that most objections that are valid at trial are not sustainable at deposition, writes Richard M. Coleman. - Forum Column

FORUM COLUMN

By Richard M. Coleman
This article appears on Page 6

      On occasion, my duties as discovery referee have included presiding over depositions and ruling on objections. Many counsel seem unaware that most objections are not sustainable at deposition. For example, the following objections, while perfectly valid at trial, are not valid at deposition: argumentative, asked and answered, assumes facts not in ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up