Civil Litigation
Jan. 26, 2005
Caps Provide Incentives to Terminate Babies' Life Support
Much of the debate about tort reform has focused on limiting noneconomic damages to $250,000. The traditional argument in favor of this position claims that such a cap would reduce the cost of malpractice insurance. An additional argument claims that there is no rational way to put a price on the value of a life or the value of lifelong pain and suffering.





Bruce G. Fagel
Law Offices of Bruce G. Fagel & AssociatesPhone: (310) 516-9035
Email: brucefagel@fagellaw.com
Whittier College School of Law
Bruce G. Fagel is licensed to practice medicine and is founder of the Law Offices of Bruce G. Fagel & Associates. He served as a consultant on medical malpractice law to the California Judicial Counsel Committee, which wrote the new CACI jury instructions. He can be reached at brucefagel@fagellaw.com
Against those claims, opponents of tort reform claim that such caps do not affect insurance costs, but they do agree that it is di...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In