This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Oct. 9, 2013

Section 101 burdens after Myriad

Left largely unaddressed was who bears the initial burden of showing that a claimed invention is naturally occurring and what evidence is needed to meet that burden. By Kevin Kabler


By Kevin Kabler


The Supreme Court's decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics Inc., 2013 DJDAR 7484 (2013), held that "a naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated." In addition, the court held that "cDNA is patent eligible because it is not naturally occurring."


Left largely unaddressed by this decision was who bears the init...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up