This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

California Courts of Appeal

Sep. 28, 2013

Districts split on mixed causes of action and anti-SLAPP

These differing analytical approaches create vastly different results for litigants advancing mixed claims. By Erik Syverson and Steven Gebelin


By Erik Syverson and Steven Gebelin


A new strategic concern is developing as a result of a split of authority in the state Court of Appeal regarding the scope of an anti-SLAPP motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16. The split concerns "mixed causes of action" which are comprised of claims arising from both protected public participation and from unprotected private acts.


Anti-SLAPP motions are brought by parties se...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up