This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Sep. 20, 2013

The uncertain state of 'internal affairs'

There is still significant uncertainty regarding the scope of the "internal affairs doctrine" in state courts. By James Hardin and Tu-Quyen Pham


By James Hardin and Tu-Quyen Pham


Companies operating in California are often incorporated out of state. If a foreign company or its directors or officers are sued in California, a threshold question is often which state's laws apply to the specific claims asserted. The "internal affairs doctrine" is a conflict of laws principle holding that only the state of incorporation should regulate a corporation's internal affairs. And if - pursuant to th...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up