This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government

Sep. 17, 2013

Favorable analysis of MICRA initiative

Trial lawyers Friday trumpeted what they called favorable wording for a ballot initiative to lift a 30-year-old cap on pain and suffering damages in medial malpractice suits.

By Paul Jones

Daily Journal Staff Writer


Despite failing to get a bill this session to lift the $250,000 cap on pain and suffering damages in medical malpractice suits, trial lawyers Friday trumpeted what they called favorable wording for a ballot initiative to do the same.


The writeup by the state attorney general's office focuses first on random drug testing of doctors, which backers say has polled well with the public, then on increasing the cap.


Ho...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up