This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Apr. 27, 2013

Is disclosure still required if there is no there, there?

The California Arbitration Act requires an arbitrator to "disclose all matters that could cause a person aware of the facts to reasonably entertain a doubt that the proposed neutral would be able to be impartial." By Alan Ribakoff

Alan Ribakoff

Arbitrator, PMA


By Alan Ribakoff


Section 1281.9 (a) of the California Arbitration Act requires a proposed neutral arbitrator to "disclose all matters that could cause a person aware of the facts to reasonably entertain a doubt that the proposed neutral would be able to be impartial." The required disclosures under the act specifically include any ground specified in Code of Civil Procedure Section 170.1 for disqualification of a judge. Section 170.1(C)(6)(iii) of the C...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails