BOOK EXCPERT
By David T. Johnson and Franklin E. Zimring The debate in the United Nations General Assembly over capital punishment in the fall of 2007 was not a direct clash on the merits of state killing as a criminal punishment but rather a contest between two views of the jurisprudential character of the death penalty in the modern world. Proponents of a non-binding resolution calling for a moratorium on state executions regarded the execution...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In