By John Roemer
Daily Journal Staff Writer The billboard company claimed it had a First Amendment argument, but a federal appellate panel Tuesday found no constitutional conflict between Los Angeles' ban on billboards and its promotion of ads at bus shelters. The decision explored the legal logic behind the ways municipal governments seek to enhance big cities' aesthetics. Three 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals jurists reversed U.S. Distri...
Daily Journal Staff Writer The billboard company claimed it had a First Amendment argument, but a federal appellate panel Tuesday found no constitutional conflict between Los Angeles' ban on billboards and its promotion of ads at bus shelters. The decision explored the legal logic behind the ways municipal governments seek to enhance big cities' aesthetics. Three 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals jurists reversed U.S. Distri...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In