This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Forum (Forum & Focus)

Jan. 6, 2009

Pet Disclosure Ruling Keeps Probationers on Too Tight a Leash

Rules requiring probationers to notify officials before purchasing a pet don't serve the safety of police officers or the public, write Samuel Knudsen and Frank Loo. - Forum Column

FORUM COLUMN

By Samuel Knudsen and Frank Loo

Last year Americans spent over $40 billion on pets, pet services and pet accessories. Every year, the studies mount about the health benefits of pets (e.g. exercise and lower blood pressure). In contrast, most probation rules require the probationer to notify the probation department about their pets prior to purchase. In the recent case of People v. Olguin, 2008 DJDAR 18850, the defendant was ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up