By Pat Broderick
Daily Journal Staff Writer Some $96 million in settlement funds from a smokeless tobacco class action in California is being held up by a lone objector. In his complaint, initially filed Jan. 25, in San Francisco Superior Court, Sean Hull argued the settlement "unfairly discriminates" against those who bought fewer than 30 cans of U.S. Smokeless Tobacco in California. Cy Pres Fund It all started eight ...
Daily Journal Staff Writer Some $96 million in settlement funds from a smokeless tobacco class action in California is being held up by a lone objector. In his complaint, initially filed Jan. 25, in San Francisco Superior Court, Sean Hull argued the settlement "unfairly discriminates" against those who bought fewer than 30 cans of U.S. Smokeless Tobacco in California. Cy Pres Fund It all started eight ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In