This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Forum (Forum & Focus)

Jan. 1, 2009

Attorneys Must Work to Counteract the 'CSI Effect' on Jurors

A recent appellate case disproves what is often called the "CSI effect" — the perception that DNA evidence is infallible, write Eric Teti and Frank Loo. - Forum Column

FORUM COLUMN

By Eric Teti and Frank Loo

"CSI: Crime Scene Investigation" and its spinoffs have created a nation that believes in the infallibility of DNA evidence. Despite an increasing number of articles by the L.A. Times and other popular media outlets exposing the problems of DNA evidence, "the "CSI effect" still exists in jurors' minds. On July 22, 2008, the California Court of Appeal, in People v. Jimenez, 165 Cal.App.4th 75, recogniz...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up