This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Dec. 31, 2008

The Court's Pregnant Pause

A case before the Supreme Court could have far-reaching ramifications for employers who rely on pre-Pregnancy Discrimination Act computations of benefits, writes Elizabeth A. Avedikian. - Focus Column

FOCUS COLUMN

By Elizabeth A. Avedikian

On Dec. 10, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in AT&T v. Hulteen. At issue is whether AT&T discriminated against pregnant women via its employment benefits system in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.

Noreen Hulteen and three other current and former AT&T female employees took pregnancy leaves before 1978 a...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up