Focus (Forum & Focus)
Dec. 23, 2008
Disturbing Behavior
A recent California appellate court decision broadens the reach of the continuing violation doctrine even further, writes Stephanie A. Collins. - Focus Column
FOCUS COLUMN
By Stephanie A. Collins Every California employment lawyer knows the statute of limitations is not exactly written in stone. The "continuing violation doctrine," as described in Richards v. CH2M Hill, Inc., 26 Cal. 4th 798 (2001), lurks in employment law fact patterns, threatening to widen the scope of actionable conduct well beyond the one year contemplated by the Fair Employment and Housing Act. A recent California appellate ...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In