This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Criminal

Oct. 21, 2004

Vandalism by Husband Is Not Excused

SAN FRANCISCO - A man's home may be his castle, but that doesn't give him a right to destroy the property he shares with his wife, an appellate court decided Tuesday.

By Peter Blumberg
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        SAN FRANCISCO - A man's home may be his castle, but that doesn't give him a right to destroy the property he shares with his wife, an appellate court decided Tuesday.
        In a novel ruling upholding a felony vandalism conviction, the 5th District Court of ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up