Litigation
Mar. 19, 2010
Work Product Ruling Reduces Gamesmanship
Practitioner Dana Cephas says both plaintiffs and defendants should applaud, not criticize, the recent decision on attorney work product.
Several commentators have unfairly criticized the March 4, 2010 ruling by the Court of Appeal in Coito v. Superior Court of Stanislaus County, 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 292, and have suggested that unless the California Supreme Court reverses that decision, the sky will fall with respect to the protection of an attorney's work product. To the contrary, the Coito decision is consistent with the purposes of the discovery statutes...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In