This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Corporate

Jul. 12, 2001

Franchisee Fodder

Unlike most franchise cases of the past several years where arbitrability was an issue, the court did not proceed with the usual knee-jerk deference to arbitration.

        By Mitchell S. Shapiro
        
        It was not long ago that one could predict with virtual certainty that a court would enforce a forum-selection clause and compel a franchisee to litigate in the frequently distant location compelled by the franchise agreement. See Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 US 1 (1972); ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up