This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Mar. 31, 2015

Muddied pregnancy disability standard

In a decision last week, the U.S. high court crafted a middle-ground approach to accommodating pregnancy-related limitations, which will surely cause confusion for employers and workers alike. By Camille Olson and Paul Kehoe


By Camille Olson and Paul Kehoe


The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision last week in Young v. United Parcel Service Inc., 12-1226 (March 25, 2015), in which it rejected the positions of both parties, and crafted a middle-ground approach to accommodating pregnancy-related limitations that do not rise to the level of a disability, which will surely cause confusion for employers and workers alike.


The Supreme Court overturned a 4th U.S. Circ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up